Youjiang Xu, Linchao Zhu, Lu Jiang, Yi Yang
It has been shown that deep neural networks are prone to overfitting on biased training data. Towards addressing this issue, meta-learning employs a meta model for correcting the training bias. Despite the promising performances, super slow training is currently the bottleneck in the meta learning approaches. In this paper, we introduce a novel Faster Meta Update Strategy (FaMUS) to replace the most expensive step in the meta gradient computation with a faster layer-wise approximation. We empirically find that FaMUS yields not only a reasonably accurate but also a low-variance approximation of the meta gradient. We conduct extensive experiments to verify the proposed method on two tasks. We show our method is able to save two-thirds of the training time while still maintaining the comparable or achieving even better generalization performance. In particular, our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance on both synthetic and realistic noisy labels, and obtains promising performance on long-tailed recognition on standard benchmarks.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | Red MiniImageNet 20% label noise | Accuracy | 51.42 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | Red MiniImageNet 60% label noise | Accuracy | 45.1 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 60% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 91.3 | MentorMix |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 60% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 26.42 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | Red MiniImageNet 40% label noise | Accuracy | 48.06 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 60% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 64.6 | MentorMix |
| Image Classification | mini WebVision 1.0 | ImageNet Top-1 Accuracy | 77 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | mini WebVision 1.0 | ImageNet Top-5 Accuracy | 92.76 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | mini WebVision 1.0 | Top-1 Accuracy | 79.4 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | mini WebVision 1.0 | Top-5 Accuracy | 92.8 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 40% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 95.37 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 40% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 94.2 | MentorMix |
| Image Classification | Red MiniImageNet 80% label noise | Accuracy | 35.5 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 40% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 75.91 | FaMUS |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 40% Symmetric Noise | Percentage correct | 71.3 | MentorMix |