TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/HIH: Towards More Accurate Face Alignment via Heatmap in H...

HIH: Towards More Accurate Face Alignment via Heatmap in Heatmap

Xing Lan, Qinghao Hu, Qiang Chen, Jian Xue, Jian Cheng

2021-04-07Face Alignmentregression
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Heatmap-based regression overcomes the lack of spatial and contextual information of direct coordinate regression, and has revolutionized the task of face alignment. Yet it suffers from quantization errors caused by neglecting subpixel coordinates in image resizing and network downsampling. In this paper, we first quantitatively analyze the quantization error on benchmarks, which accounts for more than 1/3 of the whole prediction errors for state-of-the-art methods. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel Heatmap In Heatmap(HIH) representation and a coordinate soft-classification (CSC) method, which are seamlessly integrated into the classic hourglass network. The HIH representation utilizes nested heatmaps to jointly represent the coordinate label: one heatmap called integer heatmap stands for the integer coordinate, and the other heatmap named decimal heatmap represents the subpixel coordinate. The range of a decimal heatmap makes up one pixel in the corresponding integer heatmap. Besides, we transfer the offset regression problem to an interval classification task, and CSC regards the confidence of the pixel as the probability of the interval. Meanwhile, CSC applying the distribution loss leverage the soft labels generated from the Gaussian distribution function to guide the offset heatmap training, which makes it easier to learn the distribution of coordinate offsets. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmark datasets demonstrate that our HIH can achieve state-of-the-art results. In particular, our HIH reaches 4.08 NME (Normalized Mean Error) on WFLW, and 3.21 on COFW, which exceeds previous methods by a significant margin.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFW (Extra Data)AUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFW (Extra Data)FR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFW (Extra Data)NME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
Facial Recognition and Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge)4.89HIH
Facial Recognition and Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Common)2.65HIH
Facial Recognition and Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Full)3.09HIH
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFLWAUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFLWFR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
Facial Recognition and ModellingWFLWNME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge)4.89HIH
Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Common)2.65HIH
Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Full)3.09HIH
Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)AUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)FR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)NME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
Face ReconstructionWFLWAUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
Face ReconstructionWFLWFR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
Face ReconstructionWFLWNME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3D300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge)4.89HIH
3D300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Common)2.65HIH
3D300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Full)3.09HIH
3DWFW (Extra Data)AUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3DWFW (Extra Data)FR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3DWFW (Extra Data)NME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3DWFLWAUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3DWFLWFR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3DWFLWNME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3D Face ModellingWFW (Extra Data)AUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3D Face ModellingWFW (Extra Data)FR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3D Face ModellingWFW (Extra Data)NME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3D Face Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge)4.89HIH
3D Face Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Common)2.65HIH
3D Face Modelling300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Full)3.09HIH
3D Face ModellingWFLWAUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3D Face ModellingWFLWFR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3D Face ModellingWFLWNME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)AUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)FR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFW (Extra Data)NME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH
3D Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge)4.89HIH
3D Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Common)2.65HIH
3D Face Reconstruction300WNME_inter-ocular (%, Full)3.09HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFLWAUC@10 (inter-ocular)60.5HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFLWFR@10 (inter-ocular)2.6HIH
3D Face ReconstructionWFLWNME (inter-ocular)4.08HIH

Related Papers

Language Integration in Fine-Tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Image-Based Regression2025-07-20Neural Network-Guided Symbolic Regression for Interpretable Descriptor Discovery in Perovskite Catalysts2025-07-16Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation2025-07-16Second-Order Bounds for [0,1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss2025-07-16Sparse Regression Codes exploit Multi-User Diversity without CSI2025-07-15Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementary2025-07-10Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression2025-06-26A Survey of Predictive Maintenance Methods: An Analysis of Prognostics via Classification and Regression2025-06-25