TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-...

Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation Learning

Zhicheng Huang, Zhaoyang Zeng, Yupan Huang, Bei Liu, Dongmei Fu, Jianlong Fu

2021-04-07CVPR 2021 1Representation LearningText RetrievalVisual EntailmentVisual ReasoningRetrieval
PaperPDFCodeCodeCode(official)

Abstract

We study joint learning of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Transformer for vision-language pre-training (VLPT) which aims to learn cross-modal alignments from millions of image-text pairs. State-of-the-art approaches extract salient image regions and align regions with words step-by-step. As region-based visual features usually represent parts of an image, it is challenging for existing vision-language models to fully understand the semantics from paired natural languages. In this paper, we propose SOHO to "See Out of tHe bOx" that takes a whole image as input, and learns vision-language representation in an end-to-end manner. SOHO does not require bounding box annotations which enables inference 10 times faster than region-based approaches. In particular, SOHO learns to extract comprehensive yet compact image features through a visual dictionary (VD) that facilitates cross-modal understanding. VD is designed to represent consistent visual abstractions of similar semantics. It is updated on-the-fly and utilized in our proposed pre-training task Masked Visual Modeling (MVM). We conduct experiments on four well-established vision-language tasks by following standard VLPT settings. In particular, SOHO achieves absolute gains of 2.0% R@1 score on MSCOCO text retrieval 5k test split, 1.5% accuracy on NLVR$^2$ test-P split, 6.7% accuracy on SNLI-VE test split, respectively.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Visual ReasoningNLVR2 DevAccuracy76.37SOHO
Visual ReasoningNLVR2 TestAccuracy77.32SOHO
Natural Language InferenceSNLI-VE valAccuracy85SOHO
Natural Language InferenceSNLI-VE testAccuracy84.95SOHO

Related Papers

Touch in the Wild: Learning Fine-Grained Manipulation with a Portable Visuo-Tactile Gripper2025-07-20Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Boosting Team Modeling through Tempo-Relational Representation Learning2025-07-17LaViPlan : Language-Guided Visual Path Planning with RLVR2025-07-17From Roots to Rewards: Dynamic Tree Reasoning with RL2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models2025-07-17MCoT-RE: Multi-Faceted Chain-of-Thought and Re-Ranking for Training-Free Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval2025-07-17