TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/EPE-NAS: Efficient Performance Estimation Without Training...

EPE-NAS: Efficient Performance Estimation Without Training for Neural Architecture Search

Vasco Lopes, Saeid Alirezazadeh, Luís A. Alexandre

2021-02-16Neural Architecture Search
PaperPDFCode(official)Code(official)

Abstract

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has shown excellent results in designing architectures for computer vision problems. NAS alleviates the need for human-defined settings by automating architecture design and engineering. However, NAS methods tend to be slow, as they require large amounts of GPU computation. This bottleneck is mainly due to the performance estimation strategy, which requires the evaluation of the generated architectures, mainly by training them, to update the sampler method. In this paper, we propose EPE-NAS, an efficient performance estimation strategy, that mitigates the problem of evaluating networks, by scoring untrained networks and creating a correlation with their trained performance. We perform this process by looking at intra and inter-class correlations of an untrained network. We show that EPE-NAS can produce a robust correlation and that by incorporating it into a simple random sampling strategy, we are able to search for competitive networks, without requiring any training, in a matter of seconds using a single GPU. Moreover, EPE-NAS is agnostic to the search method, since it focuses on the evaluation of untrained networks, making it easy to integrate into almost any NAS method.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)42.05EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)41.92EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)41.84EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)38.8EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)92.63EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)89.9EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)92.27EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)88.17EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)91.59EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)88.74EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)91.31EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)87.87EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)70.1EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.78EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)69.58EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.44EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)69.33EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.23EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)67.19EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)67.28EPE-NAS (N=100)
Neural Architecture SearchNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)42.05EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)41.92EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)41.84EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Accuracy (Test)38.8EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, ImageNet-16-120Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)92.63EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)89.9EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)92.27EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)88.17EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)91.59EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)88.74EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Test)91.31EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Accuracy (Val)87.87EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-10Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)70.1EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.78EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)2.3EPE-NAS (N=10)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)69.58EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.44EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)206.2EPE-NAS (N=1000)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)69.33EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)69.23EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)105.8EPE-NAS (N=500)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Test)67.19EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Accuracy (Val)67.28EPE-NAS (N=100)
AutoMLNAS-Bench-201, CIFAR-100Search time (s)20.5EPE-NAS (N=100)

Related Papers

DASViT: Differentiable Architecture Search for Vision Transformer2025-07-17AnalogNAS-Bench: A NAS Benchmark for Analog In-Memory Computing2025-06-23From Tiny Machine Learning to Tiny Deep Learning: A Survey2025-06-21One-Shot Neural Architecture Search with Network Similarity Directed Initialization for Pathological Image Classification2025-06-17DDS-NAS: Dynamic Data Selection within Neural Architecture Search via On-line Hard Example Mining applied to Image Classification2025-06-17MARCO: Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Edge Devices with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Conformal Prediction Filtering2025-06-16Finding Optimal Kernel Size and Dimension in Convolutional Neural Networks An Architecture Optimization Approach2025-06-16Directed Acyclic Graph Convolutional Networks2025-06-13