TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/SMART Frame Selection for Action Recognition

SMART Frame Selection for Action Recognition

Shreyank N Gowda, Marcus Rohrbach, Laura Sevilla-Lara

2020-12-19Action Recognition
PaperPDF

Abstract

Action recognition is computationally expensive. In this paper, we address the problem of frame selection to improve the accuracy of action recognition. In particular, we show that selecting good frames helps in action recognition performance even in the trimmed videos domain. Recent work has successfully leveraged frame selection for long, untrimmed videos, where much of the content is not relevant, and easy to discard. In this work, however, we focus on the more standard short, trimmed action recognition problem. We argue that good frame selection can not only reduce the computational cost of action recognition but also increase the accuracy by getting rid of frames that are hard to classify. In contrast to previous work, we propose a method that instead of selecting frames by considering one at a time, considers them jointly. This results in a more efficient selection, where good frames are more effectively distributed over the video, like snapshots that tell a story. We call the proposed frame selection SMART and we test it in combination with different backbone architectures and on multiple benchmarks (Kinetics, Something-something, UCF101). We show that the SMART frame selection consistently improves the accuracy compared to other frame selection strategies while reducing the computational cost by a factor of 4 to 10 times. Additionally, we show that when the primary goal is recognition performance, our selection strategy can improve over recent state-of-the-art models and frame selection strategies on various benchmarks (UCF101, HMDB51, FCVID, and ActivityNet).

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Activity RecognitionHMDB-51Average accuracy of 3 splits84.36SMART
Activity RecognitionActivityNetmAP84.4SMART
Activity RecognitionUCF1013-fold Accuracy98.64SMART
Action RecognitionHMDB-51Average accuracy of 3 splits84.36SMART
Action RecognitionActivityNetmAP84.4SMART
Action RecognitionUCF1013-fold Accuracy98.64SMART

Related Papers

A Real-Time System for Egocentric Hand-Object Interaction Detection in Industrial Domains2025-07-17Zero-shot Skeleton-based Action Recognition with Prototype-guided Feature Alignment2025-07-01EgoAdapt: Adaptive Multisensory Distillation and Policy Learning for Efficient Egocentric Perception2025-06-26Feature Hallucination for Self-supervised Action Recognition2025-06-25CARMA: Context-Aware Situational Grounding of Human-Robot Group Interactions by Combining Vision-Language Models with Object and Action Recognition2025-06-25Including Semantic Information via Word Embeddings for Skeleton-based Action Recognition2025-06-23Adapting Vision-Language Models for Evaluating World Models2025-06-22Active Multimodal Distillation for Few-shot Action Recognition2025-06-16