Qun Liu, Matthew Shreve, Raja Bala
Although data is abundant, data labeling is expensive. Semi-supervised learning methods combine a few labeled samples with a large corpus of unlabeled data to effectively train models. This paper introduces our proposed method LiDAM, a semi-supervised learning approach rooted in both domain adaptation and self-paced learning. LiDAM first performs localized domain shifts to extract better domain-invariant features for the model that results in more accurate clusters and pseudo-labels. These pseudo-labels are then aligned with real class labels in a self-paced fashion using a novel iterative matching technique that is based on majority consistency over high-confidence predictions. Simultaneously, a final classifier is trained to predict ground-truth labels until convergence. LiDAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, outperforming FixMatch (73.50% vs. 71.82%) when using 2500 labels.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | Percentage error | 7.48 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000 Labels | Accuracy (%) | 75.14 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 2500 Labels | Percentage error | 26.5 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 1000 Labels | Accuracy | 89.04 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | cifar-100, 10000 Labels | Percentage error | 23.22 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000Labels | Percentage correct | 75.14 | LiDAM |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | Percentage error | 19.17 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels | Percentage error | 7.48 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000 Labels | Accuracy (%) | 75.14 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 2500 Labels | Percentage error | 26.5 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 1000 Labels | Accuracy | 89.04 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | cifar-100, 10000 Labels | Percentage error | 23.22 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-100, 5000Labels | Percentage correct | 75.14 | LiDAM |
| Semi-Supervised Image Classification | CIFAR-10, 250 Labels | Percentage error | 19.17 | LiDAM |