TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/LiDAM: Semi-Supervised Learning with Localized Domain Adap...

LiDAM: Semi-Supervised Learning with Localized Domain Adaptation and Iterative Matching

Qun Liu, Matthew Shreve, Raja Bala

2020-10-13Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationDomain Adaptation
PaperPDF

Abstract

Although data is abundant, data labeling is expensive. Semi-supervised learning methods combine a few labeled samples with a large corpus of unlabeled data to effectively train models. This paper introduces our proposed method LiDAM, a semi-supervised learning approach rooted in both domain adaptation and self-paced learning. LiDAM first performs localized domain shifts to extract better domain-invariant features for the model that results in more accurate clusters and pseudo-labels. These pseudo-labels are then aligned with real class labels in a self-paced fashion using a novel iterative matching technique that is based on majority consistency over high-confidence predictions. Simultaneously, a final classifier is trained to predict ground-truth labels until convergence. LiDAM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, outperforming FixMatch (73.50% vs. 71.82%) when using 2500 labels.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 4000 LabelsPercentage error7.48LiDAM
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 5000 LabelsAccuracy (%)75.14LiDAM
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 2500 LabelsPercentage error26.5LiDAM
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 1000 LabelsAccuracy89.04LiDAM
Image Classificationcifar-100, 10000 LabelsPercentage error23.22LiDAM
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 5000LabelsPercentage correct75.14LiDAM
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 250 LabelsPercentage error19.17LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 4000 LabelsPercentage error7.48LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 5000 LabelsAccuracy (%)75.14LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 2500 LabelsPercentage error26.5LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 1000 LabelsAccuracy89.04LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image Classificationcifar-100, 10000 LabelsPercentage error23.22LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-100, 5000LabelsPercentage correct75.14LiDAM
Semi-Supervised Image ClassificationCIFAR-10, 250 LabelsPercentage error19.17LiDAM

Related Papers

A Privacy-Preserving Semantic-Segmentation Method Using Domain-Adaptation Technique2025-07-17Domain Borders Are There to Be Crossed With Federated Few-Shot Adaptation2025-07-14An Offline Mobile Conversational Agent for Mental Health Support: Learning from Emotional Dialogues and Psychological Texts with Student-Centered Evaluation2025-07-11The Bayesian Approach to Continual Learning: An Overview2025-07-11Doodle Your Keypoints: Sketch-Based Few-Shot Keypoint Detection2025-07-10YOLO-APD: Enhancing YOLOv8 for Robust Pedestrian Detection on Complex Road Geometries2025-07-07CORE-ReID V2: Advancing the Domain Adaptation for Object Re-Identification with Optimized Training and Ensemble Fusion2025-07-04Underwater Monocular Metric Depth Estimation: Real-World Benchmarks and Synthetic Fine-Tuning2025-07-02