TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/DPN: Detail-Preserving Network with High Resolution Repres...

DPN: Detail-Preserving Network with High Resolution Representation for Efficient Segmentation of Retinal Vessels

Song Guo

2020-09-25Segmentation
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Retinal vessels are important biomarkers for many ophthalmological and cardiovascular diseases. Hence, it is of great significance to develop automatic models for computer-aided diagnosis. Existing methods, such as U-Net follow the encoder-decoder pipeline, where detailed information is lost in the encoder in order to achieve a large field of view. Although spatial detailed information could be recovered partly in the decoder, while there is noise in the high-resolution feature maps of the encoder. And, we argue this encoder-decoder architecture is inefficient for vessel segmentation. In this paper, we present the detail-preserving network (DPN), which avoids the encoder-decoder pipeline. To preserve detailed information and learn structural information simultaneously, we designed the detail-preserving block (DP-Block). Further, we stacked eight DP-Blocks together to form the DPN. More importantly, there are no down-sampling operations among these blocks. Therefore, the DPN could maintain a high/full resolution during processing, avoiding the loss of detailed information. To illustrate the effectiveness of DPN, we conducted experiments over three public datasets. Experimental results show, compared to state-of-the-art methods, DPN shows competitive/better performance in terms of segmentation accuracy, segmentation speed, and model size. Specifically, 1) Our method achieves comparable segmentation performance on the DRIVE, CHASE_DB1, and HRF datasets. 2) The segmentation speed of DPN is over 20-160 times faster than other methods on the DRIVE dataset. 3) The number of parameters of DPN is1 around 120k, far less than all comparison methods.

Related Papers

SeC: Advancing Complex Video Object Segmentation via Progressive Concept Construction2025-07-21Deep Learning-Based Fetal Lung Segmentation from Diffusion-weighted MRI Images and Lung Maturity Evaluation for Fetal Growth Restriction2025-07-17DiffOSeg: Omni Medical Image Segmentation via Multi-Expert Collaboration Diffusion Model2025-07-17From Variability To Accuracy: Conditional Bernoulli Diffusion Models with Consensus-Driven Correction for Thin Structure Segmentation2025-07-17Unleashing Vision Foundation Models for Coronary Artery Segmentation: Parallel ViT-CNN Encoding and Variational Fusion2025-07-17SCORE: Scene Context Matters in Open-Vocabulary Remote Sensing Instance Segmentation2025-07-17Unified Medical Image Segmentation with State Space Modeling Snake2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Semantic-Segmentation Method Using Domain-Adaptation Technique2025-07-17