TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Deep Robust Clustering by Contrastive Learning

Deep Robust Clustering by Contrastive Learning

Huasong Zhong, Chong Chen, Zhongming Jin, Xian-Sheng Hua

2020-08-07Deep ClusteringOnline ClusteringData AugmentationClusteringContrastive Learning
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

Recently, many unsupervised deep learning methods have been proposed to learn clustering with unlabelled data. By introducing data augmentation, most of the latest methods look into deep clustering from the perspective that the original image and its transformation should share similar semantic clustering assignment. However, the representation features could be quite different even they are assigned to the same cluster since softmax function is only sensitive to the maximum value. This may result in high intra-class diversities in the representation feature space, which will lead to unstable local optimal and thus harm the clustering performance. To address this drawback, we proposed Deep Robust Clustering (DRC). Different from existing methods, DRC looks into deep clustering from two perspectives of both semantic clustering assignment and representation feature, which can increase inter-class diversities and decrease intra-class diversities simultaneously. Furthermore, we summarized a general framework that can turn any maximizing mutual information into minimizing contrastive loss by investigating the internal relationship between mutual information and contrastive learning. And we successfully applied it in DRC to learn invariant features and robust clusters. Extensive experiments on six widely-adopted deep clustering benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of DRC in both stability and accuracy. e.g., attaining 71.6% mean accuracy on CIFAR-10, which is 7.1% higher than state-of-the-art results.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image Clusteringcifar10online ACC11.8DRC
Image Clusteringcifar10online ARI0.3DRC
Image Clusteringcifar10online NMI1.1DRC

Related Papers

Tri-Learn Graph Fusion Network for Attributed Graph Clustering2025-07-18Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images2025-07-17SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16Ranking Vectors Clustering: Theory and Applications2025-07-16