Learning low-dimensional embeddings of knowledge graphs is a powerful approach used to predict unobserved or missing edges between entities. However, an open challenge in this area is developing techniques that can go beyond simple edge prediction and handle more complex logical queries, which might involve multiple unobserved edges, entities, and variables. For instance, given an incomplete biological knowledge graph, we might want to predict "em what drugs are likely to target proteins involved with both diseases X and Y?" -- a query that requires reasoning about all possible proteins that {\em might} interact with diseases X and Y. Here we introduce a framework to efficiently make predictions about conjunctive logical queries -- a flexible but tractable subset of first-order logic -- on incomplete knowledge graphs. In our approach, we embed graph nodes in a low-dimensional space and represent logical operators as learned geometric operations (e.g., translation, rotation) in this embedding space. By performing logical operations within a low-dimensional embedding space, our approach achieves a time complexity that is linear in the number of query variables, compared to the exponential complexity required by a naive enumeration-based approach. We demonstrate the utility of this framework in two application studies on real-world datasets with millions of relations: predicting logical relationships in a network of drug-gene-disease interactions and in a graph-based representation of social interactions derived from a popular web forum.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 1p | 0.546 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 2i | 0.397 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 2p | 0.153 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 2u | 0.221 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 3i | 0.514 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR 3p | 0.108 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR ip | 0.191 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR pi | 0.276 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k | MRR up | 0.116 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 1p | 0.35 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 2i | 0.233 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 2p | 0.072 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 2u | 0.082 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 3i | 0.346 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR 3p | 0.053 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR ip | 0.107 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR pi | 0.165 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graphs | FB15k-237 | MRR up | 0.057 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 1p | 0.546 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 2i | 0.397 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 2p | 0.153 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 2u | 0.221 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 3i | 0.514 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR 3p | 0.108 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR ip | 0.191 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR pi | 0.276 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k | MRR up | 0.116 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 1p | 0.35 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2i | 0.233 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2p | 0.072 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2u | 0.082 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 3i | 0.346 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 3p | 0.053 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR ip | 0.107 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR pi | 0.165 | GQE |
| Knowledge Graph Completion | FB15k-237 | MRR up | 0.057 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 1p | 0.546 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 2i | 0.397 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 2p | 0.153 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 2u | 0.221 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 3i | 0.514 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR 3p | 0.108 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR ip | 0.191 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR pi | 0.276 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k | MRR up | 0.116 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 1p | 0.35 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 2i | 0.233 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 2p | 0.072 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 2u | 0.082 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 3i | 0.346 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR 3p | 0.053 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR ip | 0.107 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR pi | 0.165 | GQE |
| Large Language Model | FB15k-237 | MRR up | 0.057 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 1p | 0.546 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 2i | 0.397 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 2p | 0.153 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 2u | 0.221 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 3i | 0.514 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR 3p | 0.108 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR ip | 0.191 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR pi | 0.276 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k | MRR up | 0.116 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 1p | 0.35 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2i | 0.233 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2p | 0.072 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 2u | 0.082 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 3i | 0.346 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR 3p | 0.053 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR ip | 0.107 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR pi | 0.165 | GQE |
| Inductive knowledge graph completion | FB15k-237 | MRR up | 0.057 | GQE |