TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: T...

Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkey

Ammar Rashed, Mucahid Kutlu, Kareem Darwish, Tamer Elsayed, Cansin Bayrak

2020-05-19Stance ClassificationClusteringStance Detection
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

On June 24, 2018, Turkey conducted a highly consequential election in which the Turkish people elected their president and parliament in the first election under a new presidential system. During the election period, the Turkish people extensively shared their political opinions on Twitter. One aspect of polarization among the electorate was support for or opposition to the reelection of Recep Tayyip Erdo\u{g}an. In this paper, we present an unsupervised method for target-specific stance detection in a polarized setting, specifically Turkish politics, achieving 90% precision in identifying user stances, while maintaining more than 80% recall. The method involves representing users in an embedding space using Google's Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based multilingual universal sentence encoder. The representations are then projected onto a lower dimensional space in a manner that reflects similarities and are consequently clustered. We show the effectiveness of our method in properly clustering users of divergent groups across multiple targets that include political figures, different groups, and parties. We perform our analysis on a large dataset of 108M Turkish election-related tweets along with the timeline tweets of 168k Turkish users, who authored 213M tweets. Given the resultant user stances, we are able to observe correlations between topics and compute topic polarization.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Stance DetectionTurkish Elections 2018Avg F10.84MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)
Stance DetectionTurkish Elections 2018Macro Precision0.9MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)
Stance DetectionTurkish Elections 2018Macro Recall0.79MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)
Stance DetectionTrump Midterm Elections 2018Avg F10.86MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)
Stance DetectionTrump Midterm Elections 2018Macro Precision0.89MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)
Stance DetectionTrump Midterm Elections 2018Macro Recall0.84MUSE + UMAP (Unsupervised)

Related Papers

Tri-Learn Graph Fusion Network for Attributed Graph Clustering2025-07-18Ranking Vectors Clustering: Theory and Applications2025-07-16Journalism-Guided Agentic In-Context Learning for News Stance Detection2025-07-15Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework2025-07-11GNN-ViTCap: GNN-Enhanced Multiple Instance Learning with Vision Transformers for Whole Slide Image Classification and Captioning2025-07-09Consistency and Inconsistency in $K$-Means Clustering2025-07-08LLMs are Introvert2025-07-08MC-INR: Efficient Encoding of Multivariate Scientific Simulation Data using Meta-Learning and Clustered Implicit Neural Representations2025-07-03