TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Sin...

BigNAS: Scaling Up Neural Architecture Search with Big Single-Stage Models

Jiahui Yu, Pengchong Jin, Hanxiao Liu, Gabriel Bender, Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Mingxing Tan, Thomas Huang, Xiaodan Song, Ruoming Pang, Quoc Le

2020-03-24ECCV 2020 8Neural Architecture Search
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

Neural architecture search (NAS) has shown promising results discovering models that are both accurate and fast. For NAS, training a one-shot model has become a popular strategy to rank the relative quality of different architectures (child models) using a single set of shared weights. However, while one-shot model weights can effectively rank different network architectures, the absolute accuracies from these shared weights are typically far below those obtained from stand-alone training. To compensate, existing methods assume that the weights must be retrained, finetuned, or otherwise post-processed after the search is completed. These steps significantly increase the compute requirements and complexity of the architecture search and model deployment. In this work, we propose BigNAS, an approach that challenges the conventional wisdom that post-processing of the weights is necessary to get good prediction accuracies. Without extra retraining or post-processing steps, we are able to train a single set of shared weights on ImageNet and use these weights to obtain child models whose sizes range from 200 to 1000 MFLOPs. Our discovered model family, BigNASModels, achieve top-1 accuracies ranging from 76.5% to 80.9%, surpassing state-of-the-art models in this range including EfficientNets and Once-for-All networks without extra retraining or post-processing. We present ablative study and analysis to further understand the proposed BigNASModels.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetAccuracy79.5BigNASModel-L
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetTop-1 Error Rate20.5BigNASModel-L
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetAccuracy78.9BigNASModel-M
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetTop-1 Error Rate21.1BigNASModel-M
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetAccuracy76.5BigNASModel-S
Neural Architecture SearchImageNetTop-1 Error Rate23.5BigNASModel-S
AutoMLImageNetAccuracy79.5BigNASModel-L
AutoMLImageNetTop-1 Error Rate20.5BigNASModel-L
AutoMLImageNetAccuracy78.9BigNASModel-M
AutoMLImageNetTop-1 Error Rate21.1BigNASModel-M
AutoMLImageNetAccuracy76.5BigNASModel-S
AutoMLImageNetTop-1 Error Rate23.5BigNASModel-S

Related Papers

DASViT: Differentiable Architecture Search for Vision Transformer2025-07-17AnalogNAS-Bench: A NAS Benchmark for Analog In-Memory Computing2025-06-23From Tiny Machine Learning to Tiny Deep Learning: A Survey2025-06-21One-Shot Neural Architecture Search with Network Similarity Directed Initialization for Pathological Image Classification2025-06-17DDS-NAS: Dynamic Data Selection within Neural Architecture Search via On-line Hard Example Mining applied to Image Classification2025-06-17MARCO: Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Edge Devices with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Conformal Prediction Filtering2025-06-16Finding Optimal Kernel Size and Dimension in Convolutional Neural Networks An Architecture Optimization Approach2025-06-16Directed Acyclic Graph Convolutional Networks2025-06-13