TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/DHOG: Deep Hierarchical Object Grouping

DHOG: Deep Hierarchical Object Grouping

Luke Nicholas Darlow, Amos Storkey

2020-03-13Representation LearningEdge DetectionImage ClusteringClustering
PaperPDF

Abstract

Recently, a number of competitive methods have tackled unsupervised representation learning by maximising the mutual information between the representations produced from augmentations. The resulting representations are then invariant to stochastic augmentation strategies, and can be used for downstream tasks such as clustering or classification. Yet data augmentations preserve many properties of an image and so there is potential for a suboptimal choice of representation that relies on matching easy-to-find features in the data. We demonstrate that greedy or local methods of maximising mutual information (such as stochastic gradient optimisation) discover local optima of the mutual information criterion; the resulting representations are also less-ideally suited to complex downstream tasks. Earlier work has not specifically identified or addressed this issue. We introduce deep hierarchical object grouping (DHOG) that computes a number of distinct discrete representations of images in a hierarchical order, eventually generating representations that better optimise the mutual information objective. We also find that these representations align better with the downstream task of grouping into underlying object classes. We tested DHOG on unsupervised clustering, which is a natural downstream test as the target representation is a discrete labelling of the data. We achieved new state-of-the-art results on the three main benchmarks without any prefiltering or Sobel-edge detection that proved necessary for many previous methods to work. We obtain accuracy improvements of: 4.3% on CIFAR-10, 1.5% on CIFAR-100-20, and 7.2% on SVHN.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10ARI0.492DHOG
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10Accuracy0.666DHOG
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10NMI0.585DHOG

Related Papers

DeepCS-TRD, a Deep Learning-based Cross-Section Tree Ring Detector2025-09-09Touch in the Wild: Learning Fine-Grained Manipulation with a Portable Visuo-Tactile Gripper2025-07-20Tri-Learn Graph Fusion Network for Attributed Graph Clustering2025-07-18Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Boosting Team Modeling through Tempo-Relational Representation Learning2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16Are encoders able to learn landmarkers for warm-starting of Hyperparameter Optimization?2025-07-16Language-Guided Contrastive Audio-Visual Masked Autoencoder with Automatically Generated Audio-Visual-Text Triplets from Videos2025-07-16