TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Latent Embedding Feedback and Discriminative Features for ...

Latent Embedding Feedback and Discriminative Features for Zero-Shot Classification

Sanath Narayan, Akshita Gupta, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Cees G. M. Snoek, Ling Shao

2020-03-17ECCV 2020 8Action ClassificationGeneralized Zero-Shot LearningGeneral ClassificationClassificationZero-Shot Learning
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Zero-shot learning strives to classify unseen categories for which no data is available during training. In the generalized variant, the test samples can further belong to seen or unseen categories. The state-of-the-art relies on Generative Adversarial Networks that synthesize unseen class features by leveraging class-specific semantic embeddings. During training, they generate semantically consistent features, but discard this constraint during feature synthesis and classification. We propose to enforce semantic consistency at all stages of (generalized) zero-shot learning: training, feature synthesis and classification. We first introduce a feedback loop, from a semantic embedding decoder, that iteratively refines the generated features during both the training and feature synthesis stages. The synthesized features together with their corresponding latent embeddings from the decoder are then transformed into discriminative features and utilized during classification to reduce ambiguities among categories. Experiments on (generalized) zero-shot object and action classification reveal the benefit of semantic consistency and iterative feedback, outperforming existing methods on six zero-shot learning benchmarks. Source code at https://github.com/akshitac8/tfvaegan.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Zero-Shot LearningOxford 102 Floweraverage top-1 classification accuracy70.8ZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningCUB-200-2011average top-1 classification accuracy64.9ZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningAwA2average top-1 classification accuracy72.2ZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningSUN Attributeaverage top-1 classification accuracy66ZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningAwA2Harmonic mean66.6GZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningCUB-200-2011Harmonic mean58.1GZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningOxford 102 FlowerHarmonic mean71.7GZSL_TF-VAEGAN
Zero-Shot LearningSUN AttributeHarmonic mean43GZSL_TF-VAEGAN

Related Papers

Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17GLAD: Generalizable Tuning for Vision-Language Models2025-07-17Efficient Calisthenics Skills Classification through Foreground Instance Selection and Depth Estimation2025-07-16Safeguarding Federated Learning-based Road Condition Classification2025-07-16DEARLi: Decoupled Enhancement of Recognition and Localization for Semi-supervised Panoptic Segmentation2025-07-14AI-Enhanced Pediatric Pneumonia Detection: A CNN-Based Approach Using Data Augmentation and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)2025-07-13Fuzzy Classification Aggregation for a Continuum of Agents2025-07-06Hybrid-View Attention for csPCa Classification in TRUS2025-07-04