TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Deep regularization and direct training of the inner layer...

Deep regularization and direct training of the inner layers of Neural Networks with Kernel Flows

Gene Ryan Yoo, Houman Owhadi

2020-02-19arXiv 2020 2Image Classificationregression
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

We introduce a new regularization method for Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) based on Kernel Flows (KFs). KFs were introduced as a method for kernel selection in regression/kriging based on the minimization of the loss of accuracy incurred by halving the number of interpolation points in random batches of the dataset. Writing $f_\theta(x) = \big(f^{(n)}_{\theta_n}\circ f^{(n-1)}_{\theta_{n-1}} \circ \dots \circ f^{(1)}_{\theta_1}\big)(x)$ for the functional representation of compositional structure of the ANN, the inner layers outputs $h^{(i)}(x) = \big(f^{(i)}_{\theta_i}\circ f^{(i-1)}_{\theta_{i-1}} \circ \dots \circ f^{(1)}_{\theta_1}\big)(x)$ define a hierarchy of feature maps and kernels $k^{(i)}(x,x')=\exp(- \gamma_i \|h^{(i)}(x)-h^{(i)}(x')\|_2^2)$. When combined with a batch of the dataset these kernels produce KF losses $e_2^{(i)}$ (the $L^2$ regression error incurred by using a random half of the batch to predict the other half) depending on parameters of inner layers $\theta_1,\ldots,\theta_i$ (and $\gamma_i$). The proposed method simply consists in aggregating a subset of these KF losses with a classical output loss. We test the proposed method on CNNs and WRNs without alteration of structure nor output classifier and report reduced test errors, decreased generalization gaps, and increased robustness to distribution shift without significant increase in computational complexity. We suspect that these results might be explained by the fact that while conventional training only employs a linear functional (a generalized moment) of the empirical distribution defined by the dataset and can be prone to trapping in the Neural Tangent Kernel regime (under over-parameterizations), the proposed loss function (defined as a nonlinear functional of the empirical distribution) effectively trains the underlying kernel defined by the CNN beyond regressing the data with that kernel.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClassificationQMNISTAccuracy (%)99.67Deep regularization

Related Papers

Language Integration in Fine-Tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Image-Based Regression2025-07-20Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17Neural Network-Guided Symbolic Regression for Interpretable Descriptor Discovery in Perovskite Catalysts2025-07-16Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation2025-07-16