TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Decoupled Attention Network for Text Recognition

Decoupled Attention Network for Text Recognition

Tianwei Wang, Yuanzhi Zhu, Lianwen Jin, Canjie Luo, Xiaoxue Chen, Yaqiang Wu, Qianying Wang, Mingxiang Cai

2019-12-21Handwritten Text RecognitionScene Text Recognition
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)CodeCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Text recognition has attracted considerable research interests because of its various applications. The cutting-edge text recognition methods are based on attention mechanisms. However, most of attention methods usually suffer from serious alignment problem due to its recurrency alignment operation, where the alignment relies on historical decoding results. To remedy this issue, we propose a decoupled attention network (DAN), which decouples the alignment operation from using historical decoding results. DAN is an effective, flexible and robust end-to-end text recognizer, which consists of three components: 1) a feature encoder that extracts visual features from the input image; 2) a convolutional alignment module that performs the alignment operation based on visual features from the encoder; and 3) a decoupled text decoder that makes final prediction by jointly using the feature map and attention maps. Experimental results show that DAN achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple text recognition tasks, including offline handwritten text recognition and regular/irregular scene text recognition.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Optical Character Recognition (OCR)IAMCER6.4Decouple Attention Network
Optical Character Recognition (OCR)IAMWER19.6Decouple Attention Network
Scene ParsingSVTAccuracy89.2DAN
Scene ParsingICDAR2015Accuracy74.5DAN
Scene ParsingICDAR 2003Accuracy95DAN
Scene ParsingICDAR2013Accuracy93.9DAN
2D Semantic SegmentationSVTAccuracy89.2DAN
2D Semantic SegmentationICDAR2015Accuracy74.5DAN
2D Semantic SegmentationICDAR 2003Accuracy95DAN
2D Semantic SegmentationICDAR2013Accuracy93.9DAN
Handwritten Text RecognitionIAMCER6.4Decouple Attention Network
Handwritten Text RecognitionIAMWER19.6Decouple Attention Network
Scene Text RecognitionSVTAccuracy89.2DAN
Scene Text RecognitionICDAR2015Accuracy74.5DAN
Scene Text RecognitionICDAR 2003Accuracy95DAN
Scene Text RecognitionICDAR2013Accuracy93.9DAN

Related Papers

Advancing Offline Handwritten Text Recognition: A Systematic Review of Data Augmentation and Generation Techniques2025-07-08Learning to Align: Addressing Character Frequency Distribution Shifts in Handwritten Text Recognition2025-06-11MetaWriter: Personalized Handwritten Text Recognition Using Meta-Learned Prompt Tuning2025-05-26Preserving Privacy Without Compromising Accuracy: Machine Unlearning for Handwritten Text Recognition2025-04-11Meta-DAN: towards an efficient prediction strategy for page-level handwritten text recognition2025-04-04TRIDIS: A Comprehensive Medieval and Early Modern Corpus for HTR and NER2025-03-25Linguistics-aware Masked Image Modeling for Self-supervised Scene Text Recognition2025-03-24Efficient and Accurate Scene Text Recognition with Cascaded-Transformers2025-03-24