TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierar...

ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierarchical Graph Representations

Ekagra Ranjan, Soumya Sanyal, Partha Pratim Talukdar

2019-11-18Graph ClassificationNode ClassificationGeneral ClassificationClassificationLink Prediction
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNN) have been shown to work effectively for modeling graph structured data to solve tasks such as node classification, link prediction and graph classification. There has been some recent progress in defining the notion of pooling in graphs whereby the model tries to generate a graph level representation by downsampling and summarizing the information present in the nodes. Existing pooling methods either fail to effectively capture the graph substructure or do not easily scale to large graphs. In this work, we propose ASAP (Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling), a sparse and differentiable pooling method that addresses the limitations of previous graph pooling architectures. ASAP utilizes a novel self-attention network along with a modified GNN formulation to capture the importance of each node in a given graph. It also learns a sparse soft cluster assignment for nodes at each layer to effectively pool the subgraphs to form the pooled graph. Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets and theoretical analysis, we motivate our choice of the components used in ASAP. Our experimental results show that combining existing GNN architectures with ASAP leads to state-of-the-art results on multiple graph classification benchmarks. ASAP has an average improvement of 4%, compared to current sparse hierarchical state-of-the-art method.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Graph ClassificationFRANKENSTEINAccuracy66.26ASAP
Graph ClassificationNCI109Accuracy70.07ASAP
Graph ClassificationNCI1Accuracy71.48ASAP
Graph ClassificationD&DAccuracy76.87ASAP
ClassificationFRANKENSTEINAccuracy66.26ASAP
ClassificationNCI109Accuracy70.07ASAP
ClassificationNCI1Accuracy71.48ASAP
ClassificationD&DAccuracy76.87ASAP

Related Papers

Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Calisthenics Skills Classification through Foreground Instance Selection and Depth Estimation2025-07-16Safeguarding Federated Learning-based Road Condition Classification2025-07-16AI-Enhanced Pediatric Pneumonia Detection: A CNN-Based Approach Using Data Augmentation and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)2025-07-13Topic Modeling and Link-Prediction for Material Property Discovery2025-07-08Fuzzy Classification Aggregation for a Continuum of Agents2025-07-06Graph Collaborative Attention Network for Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs2025-07-05Hybrid-View Attention for csPCa Classification in TRUS2025-07-04