TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens van der Maaten, Kilian Q. Weinberger

2016-08-25CVPR 2017 7Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionImage ClassificationCrowd CountingObject RecognitionMedical Image SegmentationMedical Image ClassificationPerson Re-IdentificationSpeaker-Specific Lip to Speech SynthesisClassificationBreast Tumour ClassificationMulti-Label Classification
PaperPDFCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCode(official)CodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCodeCode

Abstract

Recent work has shown that convolutional networks can be substantially deeper, more accurate, and efficient to train if they contain shorter connections between layers close to the input and those close to the output. In this paper, we embrace this observation and introduce the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet), which connects each layer to every other layer in a feed-forward fashion. Whereas traditional convolutional networks with L layers have L connections - one between each layer and its subsequent layer - our network has L(L+1)/2 direct connections. For each layer, the feature-maps of all preceding layers are used as inputs, and its own feature-maps are used as inputs into all subsequent layers. DenseNets have several compelling advantages: they alleviate the vanishing-gradient problem, strengthen feature propagation, encourage feature reuse, and substantially reduce the number of parameters. We evaluate our proposed architecture on four highly competitive object recognition benchmark tasks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, SVHN, and ImageNet). DenseNets obtain significant improvements over the state-of-the-art on most of them, whilst requiring less computation to achieve high performance. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/liuzhuang13/DenseNet .

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanBackpack63.9DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanGender75DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanHat67.2DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanLCC54.6DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanLCS68.9DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanUCC49.8DenseNet
Autonomous VehiclesUAV-HumanUCS73DenseNet
CrowdsUCF-QNRFMAE163Densenet201
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanBackpack63.9DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanGender75DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanHat67.2DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanLCC54.6DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanLCS68.9DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanUCC49.8DenseNet
Pedestrian Attribute RecognitionUAV-HumanUCS73DenseNet
Image ClassificationGasHisSDBAccuracy96.9DenseNet-169
Image ClassificationGasHisSDBF1-Score98.38DenseNet-169
Image ClassificationGasHisSDBPrecision99.91DenseNet-169
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct96.54DenseNet (DenseNet-BC-190)
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct82.82DenseNet-BC
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct82.62DenseNet
Image ClassificationSVHNPercentage error1.59DenseNet
Breast Tumour ClassificationPCamAUC0.921DenseNet-121 (e)
ClassificationXImageNet-12Robustness Score0.9062DenseNet121
ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KAccuracy (%)94.41DenseNet-169
ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KF1-Score96.9DenseNet-169
ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KPrecision99.87DenseNet-169
ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KSpecificity99.3DenseNet-169
Medical Image ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KAccuracy (%)94.41DenseNet-169
Medical Image ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KF1-Score96.9DenseNet-169
Medical Image ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KPrecision99.87DenseNet-169
Medical Image ClassificationNCT-CRC-HE-100KSpecificity99.3DenseNet-169

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17DiffOSeg: Omni Medical Image Segmentation via Multi-Expert Collaboration Diffusion Model2025-07-17Unified Medical Image Segmentation with State Space Modeling Snake2025-07-17Weakly Supervised Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification via Heterogeneous Expert Collaborative Consistency Learning2025-07-17