TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustnes...

Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty

Dan Hendrycks, Mantas Mazeika, Saurav Kadavath, Dawn Song

2019-06-28NeurIPS 2019 12Self-Supervised LearningUnsupervised Anomaly DetectionOutlier DetectionAnomaly DetectionOut-of-Distribution Detection
PaperPDFCodeCodeCode(official)Code

Abstract

Self-supervision provides effective representations for downstream tasks without requiring labels. However, existing approaches lag behind fully supervised training and are often not thought beneficial beyond obviating or reducing the need for annotations. We find that self-supervision can benefit robustness in a variety of ways, including robustness to adversarial examples, label corruption, and common input corruptions. Additionally, self-supervision greatly benefits out-of-distribution detection on difficult, near-distribution outliers, so much so that it exceeds the performance of fully supervised methods. These results demonstrate the promise of self-supervision for improving robustness and uncertainty estimation and establish these tasks as new axes of evaluation for future self-supervised learning research.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC85.7RotNet + Translation + Self-Attention + Resize
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC84.8RotNet + Translation + Self-Attention
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC81.6RotNet + Self-Attention
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC77.9RotNet + Translation
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC65.3RotNet
Anomaly DetectionOne-class ImageNet-30AUROC56.1Supervised (OE)
Anomaly DetectionAnomaly Detection on Anomaly Detection on Unlabeled ImageNet-30 vs Flowers-102ROC-AUC86.3ROT+Trans
Anomaly DetectionAnomaly Detection on Unlabeled ImageNet-30 vs CUB-200ROC-AUC74.5ROT+Trans
Anomaly DetectionOne-class CIFAR-10AUROC90.1SSOOD
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100AUPR67.7WRN 40-2 + Rotation Prediction
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10 vs CIFAR-100AUROC90.9WRN 40-2 + Rotation Prediction
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10AUROC96.2WRN 40-2 + Rotation Prediction
Out-of-Distribution DetectionCIFAR-10FPR9516WRN 40-2 + Rotation Prediction

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-21A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-173DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Advertising Personalization Incorporating Federated Learning and Differential Privacy2025-07-16Bridge Feature Matching and Cross-Modal Alignment with Mutual-filtering for Zero-shot Anomaly Detection2025-07-15Self-supervised Learning on Camera Trap Footage Yields a Strong Universal Face Embedder2025-07-14Robust Spatiotemporal Epidemic Modeling with Integrated Adaptive Outlier Detection2025-07-12Adversarial Activation Patching: A Framework for Detecting and Mitigating Emergent Deception in Safety-Aligned Transformers2025-07-12