TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/XE-ss

XE-ss

Reported on 28 benchmarks across 4 tasks · 1 paper

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Natural Language Processing21 results

  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-1· 2018-04-24
    62.3
    best: 69 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-2· 2018-04-24
    38.2
    best: 44 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-3· 2018-04-24
    22.5
    best: 25.3 (CoVS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-4· 2018-04-24
    13.7
    best: 16.7 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    CIDEr· 2018-04-24
    8.7
    best: 14.1 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    METEOR· 2018-04-24
    34.8
    best: 37.8 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Data-to-Text GenerationonVIST
    ROUGE-L· 2018-04-24
    29.7
    best: 33.1 (TAPM)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    BLEU-1· 2018-04-24
    62.3
    best: 69 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    BLEU-2· 2018-04-24
    38.2
    best: 44 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    BLEU-3· 2018-04-24
    22.5
    best: 25.3 (CoVS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    BLEU-4· 2018-04-24
    13.7
    best: 16.7 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    CIDEr· 2018-04-24
    8.7
    best: 14.1 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    METEOR· 2018-04-24
    34.8
    best: 37.8 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Visual StorytellingonVIST
    ROUGE-L· 2018-04-24
    29.7
    best: 33.1 (TAPM)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-1· 2018-04-24
    62.3
    best: 69 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-2· 2018-04-24
    38.2
    best: 44 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-3· 2018-04-24
    22.5
    best: 25.3 (CoVS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-4· 2018-04-24
    13.7
    best: 16.7 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    CIDEr· 2018-04-24
    8.7
    best: 14.1 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    METEOR· 2018-04-24
    34.8
    best: 37.8 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Story GenerationonVIST
    ROUGE-L· 2018-04-24
    29.7
    best: 33.1 (TAPM)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160

Adversarial7 results

  • Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-1· 2018-04-24
    62.3
    best: 69 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-2· 2018-04-24
    38.2
    best: 44 (AOG + ARS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-3· 2018-04-24
    22.5
    best: 25.3 (CoVS)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    BLEU-4· 2018-04-24
    13.7
    best: 16.7 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    CIDEr· 2018-04-24
    8.7
    best: 14.1 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    METEOR· 2018-04-24
    34.8
    best: 37.8 (HEGR)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160
  • Text GenerationonVIST
    ROUGE-L· 2018-04-24
    29.7
    best: 33.1 (TAPM)
    No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual StorytellingarXiv:1804.09160