TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/VDN

VDN

Reported on 79 benchmarks across 6 tasks · 6 papers · 27 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Methodology35 results

  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2019-02-11
    2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    SOTA
    The StarCraft Multi-Agent ChallengearXiv:1902.04043
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2
    Median Win Rate· 2019-02-11
    1
    best: 100 (ACE)
    SOTA
    The StarCraft Multi-Agent ChallengearXiv:1902.04043
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonOff_Hard_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    15
    best: 80 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonOff_Complicated_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    70
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonOff_Near_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    90
    best: 95 (QMIX)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Armored_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    5
    best: 90 (DMIX)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonOff_Distant_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    85
    best: 95 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Infantry_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    95
    best: 100 (QTRAN)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Armored_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    96.9
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 6h_vs_9z
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    13.57
    best: 16 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 3s5z_vs_4s6z
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    17.16
    best: 19.65 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 3s5z_vs_4s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    47.16
    best: 89.77 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_8m4M1M
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    13.13
    best: 16.5 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_8m4M1M
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    13.35
    best: 63.35 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC corridor_2z_vs_24zg
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    7.78
    best: 11.1 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_9m3M1M
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    17.3
    best: 19.45 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_9m3M1M
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    75
    best: 92.33 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 26m_vs_30m
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    16.69
    best: 19.17 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 26m_vs_30m
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    23.01
    best: 81.82 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.75
    best: 20.94 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    89.2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC corridor
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.47
    best: 20 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC corridor
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    85.34
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.36
    best: 20.9 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC MMM2
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    89.2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    15.41
    best: 19.4 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 27m_vs_30m
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    18.45
    best: 19.71 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 27m_vs_30m
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    63.12
    best: 91.48 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Outnumbered_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    15.6
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Infantry_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    96.9
    best: 100 (MADDPG)
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC corridor_2z_vs_24zg
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 41.19 (DDN)
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 93.75 (ACE)
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 93.75 (ACE)
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonDef_Outnumbered_parallel
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 70 (DRIMA)
  • Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningonOff_Superhard_parallel
    Median Win Rate
    0

Playing Games35 results

  • SMAConSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2019-02-11
    2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    SOTA
    The StarCraft Multi-Agent ChallengearXiv:1902.04043
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2
    Median Win Rate· 2019-02-11
    1
    best: 100 (ACE)
    SOTA
    The StarCraft Multi-Agent ChallengearXiv:1902.04043
  • SMAConOff_Hard_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    15
    best: 80 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConOff_Complicated_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    70
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConOff_Near_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    90
    best: 95 (QMIX)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConDef_Armored_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    5
    best: 90 (DMIX)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConOff_Distant_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    85
    best: 95 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConDef_Infantry_parallel
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    95
    best: 100 (QTRAN)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConDef_Armored_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    96.9
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    SOTA
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConSMAC 6h_vs_9z
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    13.57
    best: 16 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC 3s5z_vs_4s6z
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    17.16
    best: 19.65 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC 3s5z_vs_4s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    47.16
    best: 89.77 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_8m4M1M
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    13.13
    best: 16.5 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_8m4M1M
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    13.35
    best: 63.35 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC corridor_2z_vs_24zg
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    7.78
    best: 11.1 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_9m3M1M
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    17.3
    best: 19.45 (DDN)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2_7m2M1M_vs_9m3M1M
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    75
    best: 92.33 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC 26m_vs_30m
    Average Score· 2023-06-04
    16.69
    best: 19.17 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC 26m_vs_30m
    Median Win Rate· 2023-06-04
    23.01
    best: 81.82 (DMIX)
    A Unified Framework for Factorizing Distributional Value Functions for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningarXiv:2306.02430
  • SMAConSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.75
    best: 20.94 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC 3s5z_vs_3s6z
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    89.2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC corridor
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.47
    best: 20 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC corridor
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    85.34
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    19.36
    best: 20.9 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC MMM2
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    89.2
    best: 100 (ACE)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    15.41
    best: 19.4 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC 27m_vs_30m
    Average Score· 2021-02-16
    18.45
    best: 19.71 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConSMAC 27m_vs_30m
    Median Win Rate· 2021-02-16
    63.12
    best: 91.48 (DDN)
    DFAC Framework: Factorizing the Value Function via Quantile Mixture for Multi-Agent Distributional Q-LearningarXiv:2102.07936
  • SMAConDef_Outnumbered_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    15.6
    best: 100 (DRIMA)
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConDef_Infantry_sequential
    Median Win Rate· 2017-06-16
    96.9
    best: 100 (MADDPG)
    Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent LearningarXiv:1706.05296
  • SMAConSMAC corridor_2z_vs_24zg
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 41.19 (DDN)
  • SMAConSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 93.75 (ACE)
  • SMAConSMAC 6h_vs_8z
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 93.75 (ACE)
  • SMAConDef_Outnumbered_parallel
    Median Win Rate
    0
    best: 70 (DRIMA)
  • SMAConOff_Superhard_parallel
    Median Win Rate
    0

Computer Vision7 results

  • DenoisingonSIDD
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.28
    best: 40.39 (CGNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • DenoisingonSIDD
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.956
    best: 0.973 (NBNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • DenoisingonDND
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.38
    best: 40.594 (DualDn)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • DenoisingonDND
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.952
    best: 0.966 (DualDn)
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10
    Percentage correct· 2015-07-22
    92.4
    best: 99.5 (ViT-H/14)
    Training Very Deep NetworksarXiv:1507.06228
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-100
    Percentage correct· 2015-07-22
    67.8
    best: 96.08 (EffNet-L2 (SAM))
    Training Very Deep NetworksarXiv:1507.06228
  • Image ClassificationonMNIST
    Percentage error· 2015-07-22
    0.5
    best: 0.13 (Branching/Merging CNN + Homogeneous Vector Capsules)
    Training Very Deep NetworksarXiv:1507.06228

Medical4 results

  • Image DenoisingonSIDD
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.28
    best: 40.39 (CGNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • Image DenoisingonSIDD
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.956
    best: 0.973 (NBNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • Image DenoisingonDND
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.38
    best: 40.594 (DualDn)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • Image DenoisingonDND
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.952
    best: 0.966 (DualDn)
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314

Adversarial4 results

  • 3D ArchitectureonSIDD
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.28
    best: 40.39 (CGNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • 3D ArchitectureonSIDD
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.956
    best: 0.973 (NBNet)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • 3D ArchitectureonDND
    PSNR (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    39.38
    best: 40.594 (DualDn)
    SOTA
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314
  • 3D ArchitectureonDND
    SSIM (sRGB)· 2019-08-29
    0.952
    best: 0.966 (DualDn)
    Variational Denoising Network: Toward Blind Noise Modeling and RemovalarXiv:1908.11314