TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/UniMatch

UniMatch

Reported on 25 benchmarks across 4 tasks · 1 paper · 21 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Medical10 results

  • Medical Image SegmentationonACDC 5% labeled data
    Dice (Average)· 2022-08-21
    87.61
    best: 88.75 (AD-MT)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Medical Image SegmentationonACDC 10% labeled data
    Dice (Average)· 2022-08-21
    89.92
    best: 90.92 (SDCL)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Medical Image SegmentationonACDC 20% labeled data
    Dice (Average)· 2022-08-21
    90.47
    best: 91.2 (PatchCL)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO 1/512 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    31.9
    best: 50.1 (SemiVL)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO 1/256 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    38.9
    best: 55.8 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO 1/128 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    44.5
    best: 58.7 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO 1/64 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    48.2
    best: 60.4 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO 1/32 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    49.8
    best: 63.3 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonADE20K 1/16 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    31.5
    best: 46.7 (UniMatch V2)
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Semantic SegmentationonADE20K 1/32 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    28.1
    best: 45 (UniMatch V2)
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910

Computer Vision8 results

  • Change DetectiononWHU - 20% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    81.7
    best: 87.9 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononWHU - 5% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    80.2
    best: 81.8 (DiffMatch)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononWHU - 10% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    81.7
    best: 83.2 (DiffMatch)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononWHU - 40% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    85.1
    best: 88.6 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononLEVIR-CD - 10% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    82
    best: 83.8 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononLEVIR-CD - 5% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    80.7
    best: 83.3 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononLEVIR-CD - 20% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    81.7
    best: 84.3 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • Change DetectiononLEVIR-CD - 40% labeled data
    IoU· 2022-08-21
    82.1
    best: 84.62 (C2F-SemiCD)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910

Audio7 results

  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO 1/512 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    31.9
    best: 50.1 (SemiVL)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO 1/256 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    38.9
    best: 55.8 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO 1/128 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    44.5
    best: 58.7 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO 1/64 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    48.2
    best: 60.4 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO 1/32 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    49.8
    best: 63.3 (UniMatch V2)
    SOTA
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonADE20K 1/16 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    31.5
    best: 46.7 (UniMatch V2)
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910
  • 10-shot image generationonADE20K 1/32 labeled
    Validation mIoU· 2022-08-21
    28.1
    best: 45 (UniMatch V2)
    Revisiting Weak-to-Strong Consistency in Semi-Supervised Semantic SegmentationarXiv:2208.09910