TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/TCN

TCN

Reported on 31 benchmarks across 13 tasks · 7 papers · 15 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision13 results

  • Surgical phase recognitiononCholec80
    F1· 2020-03-24
    80.3
    best: 90.24 (LoViT)
    SOTA
    TeCNO: Surgical Phase Recognition with Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:2003.10751
  • Video UnderstandingonUPenn Action
    Kendall's Tau· 2017-04-23
    0.7353
    best: 0.7672 (TCC + TCN)
    SOTA
    Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from VideoarXiv:1704.06888
  • VideoonUPenn Action
    Kendall's Tau· 2017-04-23
    0.7353
    best: 0.7672 (TCC + TCN)
    SOTA
    Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from VideoarXiv:1704.06888
  • VideoonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action LocalizationonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action LocalizationonJIGSAWS
    Accuracy· 2016-08-29
    81.4
    best: 82.9 (TricorNet)
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action LocalizationonJIGSAWS
    Edit Distance· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 88.53 (RL+Tree)
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action SegmentationonJIGSAWS
    Accuracy· 2016-08-29
    81.4
    best: 82.9 (TricorNet)
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action SegmentationonJIGSAWS
    Edit Distance· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 88.53 (RL+Tree)
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • VideoonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516
  • Action LocalizationonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516

Methodology5 results

  • Zero-Shot LearningonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Zero-Shot LearningonCUB-200-2011
    average top-1 classification accuracy· 2019-08-16
    59.5
    best: 87.5 (ZeroDiff)
    Transferable Contrastive Network for Generalized Zero-Shot LearningarXiv:1908.05832
  • Zero-Shot LearningonSUN Attribute
    average top-1 classification accuracy· 2019-08-16
    61.5
    best: 77.3 (ZeroDiff)
    Transferable Contrastive Network for Generalized Zero-Shot LearningarXiv:1908.05832
  • Zero-Shot LearningonSUN Attribute
    Harmonic mean· 2019-08-16
    34
    best: 59.8 (ZeroDiff)
    Transferable Contrastive Network for Generalized Zero-Shot LearningarXiv:1908.05832
  • Zero-Shot LearningonNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516

Time Series4 results

  • Action DetectiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 99.6 (PoseC3D (RGB + Pose))
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Action DetectiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516
  • Action RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 97.4 (DSCNet (RGB + Pose))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516

Music4 results

  • Music ModelingonNottingham
    NLL· 2019-11-14
    2.783
    best: 4.05 (RNN)
    Seq-U-Net: A One-Dimensional Causal U-Net for Efficient Sequence ModellingarXiv:1911.06393
  • Music ModelingonJSB Chorales
    NLL· 2019-11-14
    8.154
    best: 8.54 (GRU)
    Seq-U-Net: A One-Dimensional Causal U-Net for Efficient Sequence ModellingarXiv:1911.06393
  • Music ModelingonNottingham
    NLL· 2018-03-04
    3.07
    best: 4.05 (RNN)
    An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence ModelingarXiv:1803.01271
  • Music ModelingonJSB Chorales
    NLL· 2018-03-04
    8.1
    best: 8.54 (GRU)
    An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence ModelingarXiv:1803.01271

Medical3 results

  • Language ModellingonPenn Treebank (Word Level)
    Test perplexity· 2019-11-14
    108.47
    best: 20.5 (GPT-3 (Zero-Shot))
    Seq-U-Net: A One-Dimensional Causal U-Net for Efficient Sequence ModellingarXiv:1911.06393
  • Language ModellingonPenn Treebank (Character Level)
    Bit per Character (BPC)· 2019-11-14
    1.31
    best: 1.38 (Bipartite Flow)
    Seq-U-Net: A One-Dimensional Causal U-Net for Efficient Sequence ModellingarXiv:1911.06393
  • Language ModellingonWikiText-103
    Test perplexity· 2018-03-04
    45.19
    best: 2.4 (RETRO (7.5B))
    An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence ModelingarXiv:1803.01271

Robots2 results

  • Activity RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 99.6 (PoseC3D (RGB + Pose))
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • Activity RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 97.4 (DSCNet (RGB + Pose))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516

Natural Language Processing2 results

  • 3D Action RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CV)· 2016-08-29
    83.1
    best: 98.3 (ST-GCN [PYSKL, 2D Skeleton])
    SOTA
    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action SegmentationarXiv:1608.08242
  • 3D Action RecognitiononNTU RGB+D
    Accuracy (CS)· 2017-04-14
    74.3
    best: 94.3 (Hulk(Finetune, ViT-L))
    Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional NetworksarXiv:1704.04516