TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/T-Few

T-Few

Reported on 36 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 1 paper · 21 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Natural Language Processing24 results

  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    Over· 2022-05-11
    0.95
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    Avg· 2022-05-11
    0.758
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    B77· 2022-05-11
    0.695
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    OSE· 2022-05-11
    0.676
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    SOT· 2022-05-11
    0.915
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TAI· 2022-05-11
    0.736
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    ToS· 2022-05-11
    0.75
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    Over· 2022-05-11
    0.95
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    Avg· 2022-05-11
    0.758
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    B77· 2022-05-11
    0.695
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    OSE· 2022-05-11
    0.676
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    SOT· 2022-05-11
    0.915
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TAI· 2022-05-11
    0.736
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    ToS· 2022-05-11
    0.75
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    ADE· 2022-05-11
    0.804
    best: 0.83 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    NIS· 2022-05-11
    0.833
    best: 0.857 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    SRI· 2022-05-11
    0.508
    best: 0.516 (GPT-3)
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TC· 2022-05-11
    0.879
    best: 0.897 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TEH· 2022-05-11
    0.586
    best: 0.722 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    ADE· 2022-05-11
    0.804
    best: 0.83 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    NIS· 2022-05-11
    0.833
    best: 0.857 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    SRI· 2022-05-11
    0.508
    best: 0.516 (GPT-3)
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TC· 2022-05-11
    0.879
    best: 0.897 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • Few-Shot Text ClassificationonRAFT
    TEH· 2022-05-11
    0.586
    best: 0.722 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638

Methodology12 results

  • ClassificationonRAFT
    Over· 2022-05-11
    0.95
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    Avg· 2022-05-11
    0.758
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    B77· 2022-05-11
    0.695
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    OSE· 2022-05-11
    0.676
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    SOT· 2022-05-11
    0.915
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    TAI· 2022-05-11
    0.736
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    ToS· 2022-05-11
    0.75
    SOTA
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    ADE· 2022-05-11
    0.804
    best: 0.83 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    NIS· 2022-05-11
    0.833
    best: 0.857 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    SRI· 2022-05-11
    0.508
    best: 0.516 (GPT-3)
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    TC· 2022-05-11
    0.879
    best: 0.897 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638
  • ClassificationonRAFT
    TEH· 2022-05-11
    0.586
    best: 0.722 (Human (crowdsourced))
    Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningarXiv:2205.05638