TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/Simple CNAPS + FETI

Simple CNAPS + FETI

Reported on 16 benchmarks across 2 tasks · 1 paper · 10 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision16 results

  • Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 10-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    57.1
    best: 65.1 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 10-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    83.1
    best: 85.9 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    77.4
    best: 97.95 (SgVA-CLIP)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 10-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    63.5
    best: 68.5 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 10-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    78.5
    best: 80.6 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 10-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    57.1
    best: 65.1 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 10-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    83.1
    best: 85.9 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 5-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    77.4
    best: 97.95 (SgVA-CLIP)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 10-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    63.5
    best: 68.5 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 10-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    78.5
    best: 80.6 (Transductive CNAPS + FETI)
    SOTA
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    90.3
    best: 98.72 (SgVA-CLIP)
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    71.4
    best: 96.8 (CAML [Laion-2b])
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    86
    best: 98.8 (CAML [Laion-2b])
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonMini-Imagenet 5-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    90.3
    best: 98.72 (SgVA-CLIP)
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    71.4
    best: 96.8 (CAML [Laion-2b])
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432
  • Few-Shot Image ClassificationonTiered ImageNet 5-way (5-shot)
    Accuracy· uses extra data· 2019-12-07
    86
    best: 98.8 (CAML [Laion-2b])
    Improved Few-Shot Visual ClassificationarXiv:1912.03432