TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/STCN

STCN

Reported on 121 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 2 papers · 28 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision137 results

  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2021-06-09
    82.7
    best: 86.8 (XMem (BL30K,MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure· 2021-06-09
    88.6
    best: 92.6 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    88.6
    best: 93.4 (Cutie+ (base))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    94.6
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.3
    best: 91.4 (ISVOS (MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    97.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    98.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    89.7
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.5
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2021-06-09
    82.7
    best: 86.8 (XMem (BL30K,MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure· 2021-06-09
    88.6
    best: 92.6 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    88.6
    best: 93.4 (Cutie+ (base))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    94.6
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.3
    best: 91.4 (ISVOS (MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    97.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    98.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    89.7
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.5
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    88.6
    best: 93.4 (Cutie+ (base))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    94.6
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.3
    best: 91.4 (ISVOS (MS))
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    97.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    98.1
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    89.7
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Recall)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.5
    SOTA
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    85.4
    best: 90.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure· 2022-08-01
    79.6
    best: 86.1 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard· 2022-08-01
    72.7
    best: 78.4 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    76.1
    best: 82.2 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    86.5
    best: 91 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2022-08-01
    85.7
    best: 90.2 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    81.9
    best: 86.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2022-08-01
    77.9
    best: 82.2 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    83
    best: 86.9 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard· 2022-08-01
    82.2
    best: 86.3 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    85.4
    best: 89.5 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    85.4
    best: 90.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure· 2022-08-01
    79.6
    best: 86.1 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard· 2022-08-01
    72.7
    best: 78.4 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    76.1
    best: 82.2 (BATMAN)
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    86.5
    best: 91 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2022-08-01
    85.7
    best: 90.2 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2022-08-01
    81.9
    best: 86.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2022-08-01
    77.9
    best: 82.2 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    83
    best: 86.9 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard· 2022-08-01
    82.2
    best: 86.3 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Mean Jaccard & F-Measure· 2022-08-01
    85.4
    best: 89.5 (XMem (BLK30K, MS))
    BATMAN: Bilateral Attention Transformer in Motion-Appearance Neighboring Space for Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2208.01159
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    85.9
    best: 90.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    81.1
    best: 86.3 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    78.2
    best: 754.8 (R50-AOST (L'=1))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonMOSE
    F· 2021-06-09
    55
    best: 75.8 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonMOSE
    J· 2021-06-09
    46.6
    best: 67.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonMOSE
    J&F· 2021-06-09
    50.8
    best: 77.9 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    best: 90.7 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    6.2
    best: 32.5 (MuG-W)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    82
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    20.2
    best: 90.6 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.3
    best: 27.2 (OFL)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    93
    best: 94.7 (SwinB-DeAOT-L)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.7
    best: 93.4 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.1
    best: 28.9 (BVS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    90.4
    best: 92.5 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2016
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    26.9
    best: 100.1 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    87
    best: 90.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    87.7
    best: 90.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    82.6
    best: 86.3 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    79.4
    best: 754.8 (R50-AOST (L'=1))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Overall· 2021-06-09
    84.2
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.3
    best: 37.2 (RGMP)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.5
    best: 91.4 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79.9
    best: 88.1 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.5
    best: 35.7 (RVOS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    76.3
    best: 84.7 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.9
    best: 91 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.3
    best: 90.2 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.2
    best: 86.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • VideoonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79
    best: 82.2 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    85.9
    best: 90.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    81.1
    best: 86.3 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    78.2
    best: 754.8 (R50-AOST (L'=1))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    F· 2021-06-09
    55
    best: 75.8 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    J· 2021-06-09
    46.6
    best: 67.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    J&F· 2021-06-09
    50.8
    best: 77.9 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    best: 90.7 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    6.2
    best: 32.5 (MuG-W)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    82
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    20.2
    best: 90.6 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.3
    best: 27.2 (OFL)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    93
    best: 94.7 (SwinB-DeAOT-L)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.7
    best: 93.4 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.1
    best: 28.9 (BVS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    90.4
    best: 92.5 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    26.9
    best: 100.1 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    87
    best: 90.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    87.7
    best: 90.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    82.6
    best: 86.3 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    79.4
    best: 754.8 (R50-AOST (L'=1))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Overall· 2021-06-09
    84.2
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.3
    best: 37.2 (RGMP)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.5
    best: 91.4 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79.9
    best: 88.1 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.5
    best: 35.7 (RVOS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    76.3
    best: 84.7 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.9
    best: 91 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.3
    best: 90.2 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.2
    best: 86.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79
    best: 82.2 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    F· 2021-06-09
    55
    best: 75.8 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    J· 2021-06-09
    46.6
    best: 67.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonMOSE
    J&F· 2021-06-09
    50.8
    best: 77.9 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    85.3
    best: 90.7 (SAM2)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    6.2
    best: 32.5 (MuG-W)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    82
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (val)
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    20.2
    best: 90.6 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.3
    best: 27.2 (OFL)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    93
    best: 94.7 (SwinB-DeAOT-L)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    91.7
    best: 93.4 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    4.1
    best: 28.9 (BVS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    90.4
    best: 92.5 (ISVOS (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2016
    Speed (FPS)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    26.9
    best: 100.1 (MobileVOS (BL30K))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    87
    best: 90.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    F-Measure (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    87.7
    best: 90.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Seen)· 2021-06-09
    82.6
    best: 86.3 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Jaccard (Unseen)· 2021-06-09
    79.4
    best: 754.8 (R50-AOST (L'=1))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2019
    Overall· 2021-06-09
    84.2
    best: 87.5 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.3
    best: 37.2 (RGMP)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    F-measure (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.5
    best: 91.4 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    J&F· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79.9
    best: 88.1 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Decay)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    10.5
    best: 35.7 (RVOS)
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonDAVIS 2017 (test-dev)
    Jaccard (Mean)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    76.3
    best: 84.7 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.9
    best: 91 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    F-Measure (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    87.3
    best: 90.2 (XMem (BL30K, MS))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Seen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    83.2
    best: 86.6 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210
  • Semi-Supervised Video Object SegmentationonYouTube-VOS 2018
    Jaccard (Unseen)· uses extra data· 2021-06-09
    79
    best: 82.2 (Cutie+ (base, MEGA))
    Rethinking Space-Time Networks with Improved Memory Coverage for Efficient Video Object SegmentationarXiv:2106.05210