TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/SREM

SREM

Reported on 63 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 1 paper · 18 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Miscellaneous42 results

  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    77.1
    best: 78.1 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    67.5
    best: 68.7 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    68.2
    best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    79.5
    best: 80.3 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    61.2
    best: 61.6 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    84.8
    best: 85.5 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    77.1
    best: 78.1 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    67.5
    best: 68.7 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    68.2
    best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    79.5
    best: 80.3 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    61.2
    best: 61.6 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    84.8
    best: 85.5 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    78.5
    best: 80.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    98.8
    best: 99 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    96.8
    best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    524.1
    best: 528.6 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    63.8
    best: 65.2 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    95.8
    best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    90.4
    best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    40.9
    best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    372.2
    best: 380.5 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    41.5
    best: 44.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    77
    best: 78.4 (CRCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    97.9
    best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    94.2
    best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    507.8
    best: 511.8 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    90.2
    best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    78.5
    best: 80.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    98.8
    best: 99 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    96.8
    best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    524.1
    best: 528.6 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    63.8
    best: 65.2 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    95.8
    best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    90.4
    best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    40.9
    best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    372.2
    best: 380.5 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    41.5
    best: 44.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    77
    best: 78.4 (CRCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    97.9
    best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    94.2
    best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    507.8
    best: 511.8 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    90.2
    best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478

Natural Language Processing21 results

  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    77.1
    best: 78.1 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    67.5
    best: 68.7 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    68.2
    best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    79.5
    best: 80.3 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    61.2
    best: 61.6 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    84.8
    best: 85.5 (ReCon)
    SOTA
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    78.5
    best: 80.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    98.8
    best: 99 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    96.8
    best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    524.1
    best: 528.6 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    63.8
    best: 65.2 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    95.8
    best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@5· 2023-12-27
    90.4
    best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Image-to-text R@1· 2023-12-27
    40.9
    best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    372.2
    best: 380.5 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@1· 2023-12-27
    41.5
    best: 44.9 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    77
    best: 78.4 (CRCL)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@10· 2023-12-27
    97.9
    best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Image-to-text R@5· 2023-12-27
    94.2
    best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    R-Sum· 2023-12-27
    507.8
    best: 511.8 (ReCon)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
    Text-to-image R@10· 2023-12-27
    90.2
    best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
    Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors MitigationarXiv:2312.16478