TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/RRN-10L

RRN-10L

Reported on 77 benchmarks across 11 tasks · 1 paper

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision35 results

  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765

Knowledge Base14 results

  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765

Graphs7 results

  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765

Methodology7 results

  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765

Playing Games7 results

  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765

Audio7 results

  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS· 2020-08-13
    0.842
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.627
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS· 2020-08-13
    2.567
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR· 2020-08-13
    24.252
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0· 2020-08-13
    0.557
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM· 2020-08-13
    0.79
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score· 2020-08-13
    5.35
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
    Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutionarXiv:2008.05765