TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/METER

METER

Reported on 21 benchmarks across 4 tasks · 2 papers

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Miscellaneous12 results

  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    76.16
    best: 84.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    96.82
    best: 98.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    93.16
    best: 96.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    57.08
    best: 68 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    90.07
    best: 92.8 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    82.66
    best: 92.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    76.16
    best: 84.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    96.82
    best: 98.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    93.16
    best: 96.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    57.08
    best: 68 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    90.07
    best: 92.8 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    82.66
    best: 92.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387

Natural Language Processing6 results

  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    76.16
    best: 84.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    96.82
    best: 98.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Image-to-text R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    93.16
    best: 96.5 (X2-VLM (large))
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@1· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    57.08
    best: 68 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@10· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    90.07
    best: 92.8 (VAST)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387
  • Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO 2014
    Text-to-image R@5· uses extra data· 2021-11-03
    82.66
    best: 92.8 (BEiT-3)
    An Empirical Study of Training End-to-End Vision-and-Language TransformersarXiv:2111.02387

Reasoning3 results

  • Visual ReasoningonWinoground
    Group Score· 2023-03-25
    12
    best: 58.75 (GPT-4V (CoT, pick b/w two options))
    Equivariant Similarity for Vision-Language Foundation ModelsarXiv:2303.14465
  • Visual ReasoningonWinoground
    Image Score· 2023-03-25
    15.75
    best: 68.75 (GPT-4V (CoT, pick b/w two options))
    Equivariant Similarity for Vision-Language Foundation ModelsarXiv:2303.14465
  • Visual ReasoningonWinoground
    Text Score· 2023-03-25
    39.25
    best: 75.5 (GPT-4o + CA)
    Equivariant Similarity for Vision-Language Foundation ModelsarXiv:2303.14465