GoMVS

Reported on 6 benchmarks across 2 tasks · 1 paper

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Methodology6 results

3D ReconstructiononDTU
Acc· 2024-04-11
0.347
best: 0.427 (PatchmatchNet)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992
3D ReconstructiononDTU
Comp· 2024-04-11
0.227
best: 0.884 (3D-R2N2)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992
3D ReconstructiononDTU
Overall· 2024-04-11
0.287
best: 0.63 (3D-R2N2)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992
3DonDTU
Acc· 2024-04-11
0.347
best: 0.427 (PatchmatchNet)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992
3DonDTU
Comp· 2024-04-11
0.227
best: 0.884 (3D-R2N2)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992
3DonDTU
Overall· 2024-04-11
0.287
best: 0.63 (3D-R2N2)
GoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo arXiv:2404.07992