Tasks SotA Datasets Papers Methods Submit About

Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable Benchmarks All SotA Datasets Papers Methods

Community

Submit Results About

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/GSC-SGR

GSC-SGR

Reported on 63 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 1 paper · 15 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Miscellaneous42 results

Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
98.9
best: 99 (UGNCL)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
525.7
best: 528.6 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
77.7
best: 78.1 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
68.4
best: 68.7 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
375.1
best: 380.5 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
98.9
best: 99 (UGNCL)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
525.7
best: 528.6 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
77.7
best: 78.1 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
68.4
best: 68.7 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
375.1
best: 380.5 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
79.5
best: 80.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
96.4
best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
64.4
best: 65.2 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
95.9
best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
90.6
best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
42.1
best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
42.2
best: 44.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
77.1
best: 78.4 (CRCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonCC152K
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
67.6
best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
78.3
best: 80.3 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
97.8
best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
94.6
best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
505.8
best: 511.8 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
60.1
best: 61.6 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
90.5
best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Image Retrieval with Multi-Modal QueryonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
84.5
best: 85.5 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
79.5
best: 80.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
96.4
best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
64.4
best: 65.2 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
95.9
best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
90.6
best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
42.1
best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
42.2
best: 44.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
77.1
best: 78.4 (CRCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
67.6
best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
78.3
best: 80.3 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
97.8
best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
94.6
best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
505.8
best: 511.8 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
60.1
best: 61.6 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
90.5
best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal Information RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
84.5
best: 85.5 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996

Natural Language Processing21 results

Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
98.9
best: 99 (UGNCL)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
525.7
best: 528.6 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
77.7
best: 78.1 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
68.4
best: 68.7 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
375.1
best: 380.5 (ReCon)
SOTA
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
79.5
best: 80.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
96.4
best: 97.2 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
64.4
best: 65.2 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
95.9
best: 96.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCOCO-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
90.6
best: 91.2 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
42.1
best: 43.6 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
42.2
best: 44.9 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
77.1
best: 78.4 (CRCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonCC152K
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
67.6
best: 68.4 (UGNCL)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@1· 2024-05-27
78.3
best: 80.3 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@10· 2024-05-27
97.8
best: 98.3 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Image-to-text R@5· 2024-05-27
94.6
best: 95.8 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
R-Sum· 2024-05-27
505.8
best: 511.8 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@1· 2024-05-27
60.1
best: 61.6 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@10· 2024-05-27
90.5
best: 92.7 (CTPR-SGR)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996
Cross-Modal RetrievalonFlickr30K-Noisy
Text-to-image R@5· 2024-05-27
84.5
best: 85.5 (ReCon)
Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning arXiv:2405.16996