TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/GRU

GRU

Reported on 18 benchmarks across 11 tasks · 10 papers · 9 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Time Series10 results

  • Trajectory PredictiononVi-Fi Multi-modal Dataset
    MSE-D· 2024-04-02
    28.69
    best: 13.42 (OOSTraj)
    SOTA
    OOSTraj: Out-of-Sight Trajectory Prediction With Vision-Positioning DenoisingarXiv:2404.02227
  • Trajectory PredictiononVi-Fi Multi-modal Dataset
    MSE-P· 2024-04-02
    28.65
    best: 13.83 (OOSTraj)
    SOTA
    OOSTraj: Out-of-Sight Trajectory Prediction With Vision-Positioning DenoisingarXiv:2404.02227
  • Traffic PredictiononSZ-Taxi
    MAE @ 15min· 2018-11-12
    2.6814
    best: 2.0198 (factorized ST-TGCN)
    SOTA
    T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic PredictionarXiv:1811.05320
  • Traffic PredictiononSZ-Taxi
    MAE @ 30min· 2018-11-12
    2.7009
    best: 2.2951 (factorized ST-TGCN)
    SOTA
    T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic PredictionarXiv:1811.05320
  • Traffic PredictiononSZ-Taxi
    MAE @ 45min· 2018-11-12
    2.7207
    best: 2.3689 (factorized ST-TGCN)
    SOTA
    T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic PredictionarXiv:1811.05320
  • Traffic PredictiononSZ-Taxi
    MAE @ 60min· 2018-11-12
    2.7431
    best: 2.4476 (factorized ST-TGCN)
    SOTA
    T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic PredictionarXiv:1811.05320
  • Trajectory PredictiononVi-Fi Multi-modal Dataset
    SUM· 2024-04-02
    57.34
    best: 200.9 (ViTag)
    OOSTraj: Out-of-Sight Trajectory Prediction With Vision-Positioning DenoisingarXiv:2404.02227
  • Time Series ClassificationonEigenWorms
    % Test Accuracy· 2023-09-21
    82.1
    best: 92.3 (LEM)
    Parallelizing non-linear sequential models over the sequence lengtharXiv:2309.12252
  • Time Series ClassificationonPhysioNet Challenge 2012
    AUPRC· 2021-06-29
    51.4
    best: 55.1 (GRU-D - APC (n = 1))
    As easy as APC: overcoming missing data and class imbalance in time series with self-supervised learningarXiv:2106.15577
  • Time Series AnalysisonPhysioNet Challenge 2012
    F1· 2021-06-29
    22.3
    best: 87.47 (naive classifier)
    As easy as APC: overcoming missing data and class imbalance in time series with self-supervised learningarXiv:2106.15577

Audio3 results

  • Emotion RecognitiononCREMA-D
    Accuracy· 2020-01-13
    55.01
    best: 94.07 (Vertically long patch ViT)
    SOTA
    Visually Guided Self Supervised Learning of Speech RepresentationsarXiv:2001.04316
  • Speech RecognitiononTIMIT
    Percentage error· 2018-11-19
    16.6
    best: 8.3 (wav2vec 2.0)
    The PyTorch-Kaldi Speech Recognition ToolkitarXiv:1811.07453
  • Lung Sound ClassificationonICBHI Respiratory Sound Database
    Accurcay
    95.7
    best: 99.6 (RDLINet)

Speech2 results

  • Speech Emotion RecognitiononCREMA-D
    Accuracy· 2020-01-13
    55.01
    best: 94.07 (Vertically long patch ViT)
    SOTA
    Visually Guided Self Supervised Learning of Speech RepresentationsarXiv:2001.04316
  • Keyword SpottingonGoogle Speech Commands
    Google Speech Commands V1 12· uses extra data· 2017-11-20
    93.5
    best: 98.56 (TripletLoss-res15)
    Hello Edge: Keyword Spotting on MicrocontrollersarXiv:1711.07128

Music2 results

  • Music ModelingonJSB Chorales
    NLL· 2014-12-11
    8.54
    SOTA
    Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence ModelingarXiv:1412.3555
  • Music ModelingonNottingham
    NLL· 2018-03-04
    3.46
    best: 4.05 (RNN)
    An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence ModelingarXiv:1803.01271

Medical1 result

  • Language ModellingonWikiText-103
    Validation perplexity· 2020-05-17
    53.78
    best: 13.11 (Ensemble of All)
    How much complexity does an RNN architecture need to learn syntax-sensitive dependencies?arXiv:2005.08199