TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/EM-ML

EM-ML

Reported on 15 benchmarks across 5 tasks · 1 paper · 15 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision12 results

  • VideoonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1-0.5)· 2020-03-31
    44.9
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • VideoonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1:0.7)· 2020-03-31
    37.7
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • VideoonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.3-0.7)· 2020-03-31
    30.4
    best: 51.1 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1-0.5)· 2020-03-31
    44.9
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1:0.7)· 2020-03-31
    37.7
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.3-0.7)· 2020-03-31
    30.4
    best: 51.1 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1-0.5)· 2020-03-31
    44.9
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1:0.7)· 2020-03-31
    37.7
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.3-0.7)· 2020-03-31
    30.4
    best: 51.1 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1-0.5)· 2020-03-31
    44.9
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1:0.7)· 2020-03-31
    37.7
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.3-0.7)· 2020-03-31
    30.4
    best: 51.1 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163

Methodology3 results

  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1-0.5)· 2020-03-31
    44.9
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.1:0.7)· 2020-03-31
    37.7
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS14
    avg-mAP (0.3-0.7)· 2020-03-31
    30.4
    best: 51.1 (HR-Pro)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization with Expectation-Maximization Multi-Instance LearningarXiv:2004.00163