Tasks SotA Datasets Papers Methods Submit About

Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable Benchmarks All SotA Datasets Papers Methods

Community

Submit Results About

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/EGCL

EGCL

Reported on 16 benchmarks across 2 tasks · 1 paper

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Robots8 results

Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-traffic
ALL (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
35.76
best: 41.4 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-traffic
HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
60.05
best: 63.73 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-traffic
R (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
19.73
best: 24.35 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-traffic
R+HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
24.19
best: 28.86 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-campus
ALL (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
34.87
best: 44.34 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-campus
HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
65.27
best: 81.28 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-campus
R (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
24.84
best: 34.73 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Autonomous VehiclesonTJU-Ped-campus
R+HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
32.39
best: 42.26 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974

Computer Vision8 results

Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-traffic
ALL (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
35.76
best: 41.4 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-traffic
HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
60.05
best: 63.73 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-traffic
R (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
19.73
best: 24.35 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-traffic
R+HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
24.19
best: 28.86 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-campus
ALL (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
34.87
best: 44.34 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-campus
HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
65.27
best: 81.28 (FCOS)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-campus
R (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
24.84
best: 34.73 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974
Pedestrian DetectiononTJU-Ped-campus
R+HO (miss rate)· 2021-11-17
32.39
best: 42.26 (RetinaNet)
Pedestrian Detection by Exemplar-Guided Contrastive Learning arXiv:2111.08974