Deep Biaffine + RoBERTa

Reported on 2 benchmarks across 1 task · 1 paper · 2 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Natural Language Processing2 results

Dependency ParsingonPenn Treebank
LAS· 2016-11-06
95.75
best: 96.26 (Label Attention Layer + HPSG + XLNet)
SOTA
Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsing arXiv:1611.01734
Dependency ParsingonPenn Treebank
UAS· 2016-11-06
97.29
best: 97.42 (Label Attention Layer + HPSG + XLNet)
SOTA
Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsing arXiv:1611.01734