TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/DUF-28L

DUF-28L

Reported on 77 benchmarks across 11 tasks

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision35 results

  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 3D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • VideoonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • Video Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 3D Object Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)

Knowledge Base14 results

  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 2D Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 3D Absolute Human Pose EstimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)

Graphs7 results

  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • Super-ResolutiononMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)

Methodology7 results

  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 3DonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)

Playing Games7 results

  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 3D Face AnimationonMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)

Audio7 results

  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    1 - LPIPS
    0.87
    best: 0.623 (DFDnet)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    ERQAv1.0
    0.645
    best: 0.758 (VRT)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    FPS
    0.418
    best: 5.882 (SRMD)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    PSNR
    25.852
    best: 31.669 (VRT)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    QRCRv1.0
    0.549
    best: 0.722 (VRT)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    SSIM
    0.83
    best: 0.902 (VRT)
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionMSU Video Super Resolution Benchmark: Detail Restoration
    Subjective score
    5.324
    best: 7.628 (VRT)