TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/DGAM

DGAM

Reported on 25 benchmarks across 5 tasks · 1 paper · 10 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision20 results

  • VideoonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP· 2020-03-27
    24.4
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • VideoonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    41
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP· 2020-03-27
    24.4
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    41
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP· 2020-03-27
    24.4
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    41
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP· 2020-03-27
    24.4
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    41
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5· 2020-03-27
    45.6
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7· 2020-03-27
    37
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    28.8
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5· 2020-03-27
    45.6
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7· 2020-03-27
    37
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    28.8
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5· 2020-03-27
    45.6
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7· 2020-03-27
    37
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    28.8
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5· 2020-03-27
    45.6
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7· 2020-03-27
    37
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    28.8
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424

Methodology5 results

  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP· 2020-03-27
    24.4
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    41
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
    SOTA
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5· 2020-03-27
    45.6
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7· 2020-03-27
    37
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5· 2020-03-27
    28.8
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
    Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Generative Attention ModelingarXiv:2003.12424