TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/DBG (i3d feature)

DBG (i3d feature)

Reported on 16 benchmarks across 4 tasks · 1 paper

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision12 results

  • VideoonFineAction
    mAP· 2019-11-11
    6.75
    best: 29.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • VideoonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.5· 2019-11-11
    10.65
    best: 46.4 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • VideoonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.75· 2019-11-11
    6.43
    best: 29.5 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • VideoonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.95· 2019-11-11
    2.5
    best: 7.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP· 2019-11-11
    6.75
    best: 29.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.5· 2019-11-11
    10.65
    best: 46.4 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.75· 2019-11-11
    6.43
    best: 29.5 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.95· 2019-11-11
    2.5
    best: 7.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP· 2019-11-11
    6.75
    best: 29.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.5· 2019-11-11
    10.65
    best: 46.4 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.75· 2019-11-11
    6.43
    best: 29.5 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Action LocalizationonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.95· 2019-11-11
    2.5
    best: 7.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127

Methodology4 results

  • Zero-Shot LearningonFineAction
    mAP· 2019-11-11
    6.75
    best: 29.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Zero-Shot LearningonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.5· 2019-11-11
    10.65
    best: 46.4 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Zero-Shot LearningonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.75· 2019-11-11
    6.43
    best: 29.5 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127
  • Zero-Shot LearningonFineAction
    mAP IOU@0.95· 2019-11-11
    2.5
    best: 7.6 (RDFA-S6 (InternVideo2-6B))
    Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary GeneratorarXiv:1911.04127