TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/CDE-HTCN

CDE-HTCN

Reported on 10 benchmarks across 2 tasks

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Music5 results

  • Music Source SeparationonMUSDB18
    SDR (avg)
    6.89
    best: 9.2 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • Music Source SeparationonMUSDB18
    SDR (bass)
    7.92
    best: 10.47 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • Music Source SeparationonMUSDB18
    SDR (drums)
    7.33
    best: 10.83 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • Music Source SeparationonMUSDB18
    SDR (other)
    4.92
    best: 7.08 (Band-Split RNN (semi-sup.))
  • Music Source SeparationonMUSDB18
    SDR (vocals)
    7.37
    best: 10.47 (Band-Split RNN (semi-sup.))

Methodology5 results

  • 2D ClassificationonMUSDB18
    SDR (avg)
    6.89
    best: 9.2 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • 2D ClassificationonMUSDB18
    SDR (bass)
    7.92
    best: 10.47 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • 2D ClassificationonMUSDB18
    SDR (drums)
    7.33
    best: 10.83 (Sparse HT Demucs (fine tuned))
  • 2D ClassificationonMUSDB18
    SDR (other)
    4.92
    best: 7.08 (Band-Split RNN (semi-sup.))
  • 2D ClassificationonMUSDB18
    SDR (vocals)
    7.37
    best: 10.47 (Band-Split RNN (semi-sup.))