CASE + Zhou et al.
Reported on 5 benchmarks across 5 tasks · 1 paper
Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.
Computer Vision4 results
- mAP@0.1:0.7· 2023-12-2149.2best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
- mAP@0.1:0.7· 2023-12-2149.2best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
- mAP@0.1:0.7· 2023-12-2149.2best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
- mAP@0.1:0.7· 2023-12-2149.2best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
Methodology1 result
- mAP@0.1:0.7· 2023-12-2149.2best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)