TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/AFPS

AFPS

Reported on 35 benchmarks across 5 tasks

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision28 results

  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5
    59.1
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7
    48.5
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
  • VideoonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5
    41
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
  • VideoonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5
    43.9
    best: 45.1 (PivoTAL)
  • VideoonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5:0.95
    27.3
    best: 28.8 (SAL)
  • VideoonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP
    29.9
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
  • VideoonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5
    48.6
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5
    59.1
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7
    48.5
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5
    41
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5
    43.9
    best: 45.1 (PivoTAL)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5:0.95
    27.3
    best: 28.8 (SAL)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP
    29.9
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
  • Temporal Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5
    48.6
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5
    59.1
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7
    48.5
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
  • Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5
    41
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5
    43.9
    best: 45.1 (PivoTAL)
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5:0.95
    27.3
    best: 28.8 (SAL)
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP
    29.9
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
  • Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5
    48.6
    best: 49.6 (AICL)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5
    59.1
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7
    48.5
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5
    41
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5
    43.9
    best: 45.1 (PivoTAL)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5:0.95
    27.3
    best: 28.8 (SAL)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP
    29.9
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
  • Weakly Supervised Action LocalizationonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5
    48.6
    best: 49.6 (AICL)

Methodology7 results

  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.5
    59.1
    best: 71.6 (HR-Pro)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.1:0.7
    48.5
    best: 60.3 (HR-Pro)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonTHUMOS 2014
    mAP@0.5
    41
    best: 52.2 (HR-Pro)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5
    43.9
    best: 45.1 (PivoTAL)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.3
    mAP@0.5:0.95
    27.3
    best: 28.8 (SAL)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.2
    Mean mAP
    29.9
    best: 30.8 (SAL)
  • Zero-Shot LearningonActivityNet-1.2
    mAP@0.5
    48.6
    best: 49.6 (AICL)