Tasks
SotA
Datasets
Papers
Methods
Submit
About
SotA
/
Natural Language Processing
/
Fake News Detection
/
FNC-1
Fake News Detection on FNC-1
Metric: Per-class Accuracy (Discuss) (higher is better)
Leaderboard
Dataset
Loading chart...
Results
Submit a result
Hide extra data
Export CSV
Sort:
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss) (best first)
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss) (worst first)
Date (newest first)
Date (oldest first)
Model name (A→Z)
#
Model
↕
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
▼
Extra Data
Paper
Date
↕
Code
1
ZAINAB A. JAWAD, AHMED J. OBAID (CNN and DNN with SCM, 2022)
87.7
No
Combination Of Convolution Neural Networks And D...
2022-10-15
-
2
Sepúlveda-Torres R., Vicente M., Saquete E., Lloret E., Palomar M. (2021)
85.97
No
-
-
Code
3
Bhatt et al.
85.68
No
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical ...
2017-12-11
Code
4
Bi-LSTM (max-pooling, attention)
81.52
No
Combining Similarity Features and Deep Represent...
2018-11-02
Code
5
3rd place at FNC-1 - Team UCL Machine Reading (Riedel et al., 2017)
81.38
No
A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake...
2017-07-11
Code
6
Baseline based on skip-thought embeddings (Bhatt et al., 2017)
81.2
No
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical ...
2017-12-11
Code
7
Neural baseline based on bi-directional LSTMs (Bhatt et al., 2017)
58.132
Yes
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical ...
2017-12-11
Code
8
Baseline based on word2vec + hand-crafted features (Bhatt et al., 2017)
53.38
No
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical ...
2017-12-11
Code
#1
ZAINAB A. JAWAD, AHMED J. OBAID (CNN and DNN with SCM, 2022)
SOTA
87.7
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2022-10-15
Combination Of Convolution Neural Networks And Deep Neural Networks For Fake News Detection
#2
Sepúlveda-Torres R., Vicente M., Saquete E., Lloret E., Palomar M. (2021)
85.97
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
No paper
Code
#3
Bhatt et al.
SOTA
85.68
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2017-12-11
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
Code
#4
Bi-LSTM (max-pooling, attention)
81.52
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2018-11-02
Combining Similarity Features and Deep Representation Learning for Stance Detection in the Context of Checking Fake News
Code
#5
3rd place at FNC-1 - Team UCL Machine Reading (Riedel et al., 2017)
SOTA
81.38
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2017-07-11
A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task
Code
#6
Baseline based on skip-thought embeddings (Bhatt et al., 2017)
81.2
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2017-12-11
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
Code
#7
Neural baseline based on bi-directional LSTMs (Bhatt et al., 2017)
58.132
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· Extra Data
· 2017-12-11
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
Code
#8
Baseline based on word2vec + hand-crafted features (Bhatt et al., 2017)
53.38
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
· 2017-12-11
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
Code